Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:18:05 +0800 From: Rong-En Fan <rafan@freebsd.org> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: mnag@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fix for FreeBSD-SA-08:01.pty appears to break net/omnitty? Message-ID: <20080220021805.GL97111@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <20080220021259.GS47504@bunrab.catwhisker.org> References: <20080129032111.GH40423@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20080220020707.GK97111@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <20080220021259.GS47504@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:12:59PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:07:07AM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote: > > FYI, this is fixed in omnitty 0.3.0_1. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Should I file a PR against misc/compat6x (because its version of > libutil.so is apparently still subject PTY security advisory)? Maintainer is CC'ed. I think we should update misc/compat6x to use contents from 6.3-RELEASE. And filing a PR is also good.=20 Regards, Rong-En Fan --muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHu43d144QkYb9jGgRAqoeAJ0Q27XaUizAvv0GZ5NrXdV6GKGz2QCfbeut 48ViWkFW0Ra3+8Rzrqkz0sM= =L+Re -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080220021805.GL97111>