Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:05:05 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/gnome-vfs: KERBEROS Message-ID: <1231783505.38195.23.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <496B46D6.4060106@icyb.net.ua> References: <496B46D6.4060106@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-kKoH+ygXozN8uaJsxwhF
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 15:34 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I have a system where KERBEROS is disabled via src.conf, devel/gnome-vfs
> port refuses to build there:
>=20
> .if defined(WITHOUT_KERBEROS)
> @${ECHO_CMD} "${PKGNAME}: KERBEROS is required."
> @${FALSE}
> .endif
>=20
> I wonder if the port really must require KERBEROS and, if yes, why.
> I tried to comment out the above check and port was built and istalled
> correctly. I do not see any bad side-effects so far.
It used to be required to build gnome-vfs. It still is used heavily by
evolution. Additionally, we only do testing with kerberos installed, so
I do not know what issues may arise by not having it.
Joe
--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
--=-kKoH+ygXozN8uaJsxwhF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAklrhlEACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4dIswCff5w6zvqEl994AuQyrY7jwjia
wowAnjbvqem5Gaz+zgPkIDYvnMeC0mFz
=JE20
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-kKoH+ygXozN8uaJsxwhF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1231783505.38195.23.camel>