Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:00:26 +0100 From: Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk> To: Henri Hennebert <hlh@restart.be> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Nenhum_de_Nos <matheus@eternamente.info> Subject: Re: ZFS pool from current Message-ID: <1245258026.40309.50.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <4A3902DE.3070708@restart.be> References: <80e5e7a7219ab28dfc5d821f14c1ba1e.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <4A38FAAE.7060100@andric.com> <f239a78505f48923b71e315fb643deb8.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <4A3902DE.3070708@restart.be>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:51 +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > thanks, I was just looking for this update on web interface to cvs and > > there is nothing in UPDATING for RELENG_7 there. is this really supposed > > to happen ? > > Sadly a known and ignored problem of cvsweb > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/120185 > > Henri As far as I can tell, this isn't really a problem with cvsweb, but more of a problem with the repository itself. The issue comes when a commit is made and the log message includes the magic string that CVS uses internally to track different revisions. The patch proposed in that PR appears to be more of a hack than a fix. It's the same reason that (for example) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/rc.d/ntpd lists a revision 1.335 even though the most recent commit was version 1.18. On the upside, it doesn't appear that these bogus commits have ended up replicated in the SVN repository. Gavin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1245258026.40309.50.camel>