Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:53:09 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Peter Cornelius <pcc@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vimage vs. jails Message-ID: <4A8B30D5.9000400@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20090818215721.23230@gmx.net> References: <20090818215721.23230@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
it's not Vimage vs Jails but Vimage as part of Jails. Peter Cornelius wrote: > Hi there, > > I just see the vimage changes going into RELENG_8 and I now am > getting my hands dirty, finally. So thanks to all involved. > > Just to get my head around this the right way, I understand that > there is no plan to merge vimage and jail into a single jail > utility, right? Actually it IS now all one utility... Add the 'vnet' option to jail to get it to create a new vnet withthe jail, otherwise it acts as before. > > I may want a large number of vimages "w/o" jails, or at least a > number of jails "inside" a couple of vimages (reason being the > default route issue raised a while ago). can you expand on that? example comand lines include: jail -c host.hostname=test path=/ vnet command=/bin/tcsh ( make a jail with the same root as normal but with a separate network stack.) jail -c host.hostname=test path=/ vnet children.max=4 \ command=/bin/tcsh (same as above, excep the jail made is in turn able to make up to 4 child jails > > Thanks again, and > > All the best, > > Peter. > > --- > > PS. I see a couple of lock order reversals on RELENG_8 which I > would like to report if the build currently running did not address > them -- do we prefer them to a mailing list or to gnats?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A8B30D5.9000400>