Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 05 Apr 2002 19:42:29 +0200
From:      Paul Everlund <tdv94ped@cs.umu.se>
To:        Paul Bille <Paul@eBille.cudenver.edu>
Cc:        Freebsd-Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: HTML mail (hub.freebsd.org spam policy)
Message-ID:  <3CADE205.819F1580@cs.umu.se>
References:  <NABBKDMEKLDADELPGJPHGEHDENAA.Paul@eBille.cudenver.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul Bille wrote:
> 
> > It's also quite easy to configure your mail client to not send HTML at
> > all, but plain text.
> 
> I don't know if this topic is appropriate for the FreeBSD list but . . .
>
> IMHO, Although HTML email isn't appropriate for this list or any where the
> target audience is likely to be using a text only mail application, it is a
> valuable tool to reach folks using HTML enabled mail apps like Outlook or
> Netscape Messenger for the following reasons:
> 
> 1. It provides some control over aesthetic features that make the message
> more readable.

Agree! It might look better in HTML provided the sender have basic skills
in layout techniques :-), else it might make a message unreadable. Also,
as different versions of HTML are used, one can end up in not being able
to read the HTM-mail at all. Anyway I agree. Used in the right way they
are not all bad.

> 2. It allows the author to include references to additional information
> without necessarily bundling all the referenced material into the message.
> i.e. smaller e-mail HTML stub

References. Yep. But how does it work if one want to make a reply to an HTML-
mail? Haven't ever tried it, so I don't know if one can do it in a neat way.
Also some text based mailreaders can handle URLs, so one can view the refe-
renced pages anyway. But this is probably not valid for all mailreading apps.

> 3. It allows the recipient to download on demand spreading the impact on the
> network over time.  This does alleviate network contention particularly with
> mass mailings and large attachments.

Huh? That I didn't got, what you'd mean. Some mailreading programs just down-
load the received mail headers. First when you want to read it, it is down-
loaded to your harddrive. But I'm not sure it was this you meant. :-)

> Although we do include URLs in email messages as an alternative to sending
> HTML format messages, HREFs are much more appealing to people than URLs.
> I'm presuming of course that I'm sending this message to a person and not
> just to a computer ;-)

Some people like to talk of the brain as a computer. If so, then the message
is send to a computer, and then read by an even bigger and better computer.
:-)

> Don't give up on HTML format e-mail completely.  "Send e-mail in HTML
> format" is a recipient attribute in both Outlook and Netscape Messenger.
> Set it accordingly.

HTML-mails are not bad, although some viruses uses HTML-exploits, as a virus
which started automatically due to a bug in IE. Luckily the Netscape version
I'm using didn't support this IE HTML-extension, so it didn't execute. And
there are probably security holes in some text only mail readers too, but
not that common I guess.

There are pros and cons to everything in the world. :-)

> Thanks,
> Paul
> http://bille.cudenver.edu/author

Best regards,
Paul

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CADE205.819F1580>