Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:29:53 +0100
From:      =?UTF-8?B?Tmlrb2xhIFBhdmxvdmnEhw==?= <nzp@riseup.net>
To:        Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>, d@delphij.net,  freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Massive ports update?
Message-ID:  <52F12391.6060101@riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <52F0A889.7090803@freebsd.org>
References:  <52F081AF.8030402@riseup.net> <52F08713.3080206@delphij.net> <52F0A889.7090803@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--HdSpeJRguQkLUnxRXVxtoTgirNSNbKru4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 04/02/14 09:44, Colin Percival wrote:
> On 02/03/14 22:22, Xin Li wrote:
>> On 2/3/14, 9:59 PM, Nikola Pavlovi=C4=87 wrote:
>>> Was there a *huge* update to ports tree tonight between around 00:20 =
and
>>> 06:30 CET?  Portsnap just fetched 24720 patches (this is more or less=

>>> every port I guess), but I can't find anything in=20
>>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ that would correspond to this. =
I'm
>>> a bit worried. :)
>>
>> This may be related to my upgrade operation on the portsnap builder, w=
hich
>> happened around UTC midnight, right after a new "snap" snapshot is tak=
en.
>=20
> I'm pretty sure this resulted from changes to libarchive / bsdtar.  Wit=
h
> them generating different tarballs for the same input, the portsnap bui=
ld
> thinks that everything has changed.
>=20
> ... there's actually code on the portsnap builder to revert such change=
s,
> but I don't think delphij knew about it and I didn't realize he was
> upgrading the portsnap builder until too late.
>=20

I see, thanks.  This sounds like mystery solved, but I can't be the only
one who's seen this, so just to be sure---has anyone else had the same
thing happen?  (Unfortunately, I don't have another FreeBSD machine at
hand, unrelated to the one from the first post, to check.)




--HdSpeJRguQkLUnxRXVxtoTgirNSNbKru4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=3wvs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HdSpeJRguQkLUnxRXVxtoTgirNSNbKru4--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52F12391.6060101>