Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 15:18:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> Cc: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Iozone: local vs nfs drives Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.961017151743.452B-100000@spirit.ki.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.93.961018020355.25359C-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Oct 1996, Michael Hancock wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 1996, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > > > > > > I would be interested in the answer to this, I see the same behaviour on > > a 2940/Quantum Atlas combo, although the numbers are quite a bit higher. > > :) > > > > In any case, given specifically the issue of news, where most activity is > > reading, this is disturbing. > > IOZONE isn't the benchmark to use to determine news performance. > Actually, both my IOZONE tests were done on "non-news" drives... they were done on /usr, on relatively dead systems.. Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.95.961017151743.452B-100000>