Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:27:34 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: ibmed <ibmed@mail.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em driver problems? taskq em goes up to 100% CPU Message-ID: <20081231232734.GE87057@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <21218952.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <21218952.post@talk.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2008-Dec-30 07:58:58 -0800, ibmed <ibmed@mail.ru> wrote: >There's two FreeBSD boxes that do ipfw nat. >Both worked with natd until some time ago, when it became clear that we ne= ed >a better solution. So I upgraded sources and recompiled to kernel to inclu= de >ipfw nat features. The boxes have onboard msk-net cards that worked fine >under natd. When I ran into similar load issues, I switched to ipfilter because the IPFW kernel NAT didn't exist at the time. If you are unable to find another solution, possibly you could try a different firewall. >options DUMMYNET >options IPDIVERT Are you using dummynet or ipdivert functionality? >fastforwarding is on, polling is off: >net.inet.ip.fastforwarding: 1 Have you tried disabling fastforwarding? What if your hardware configuration and how much traffic are you pushing through the system? --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklb/+YACgkQ/opHv/APuIdY/ACfRKDrhw1wbK0gg9MnB2pyv8Mv hqcAnA05l0TYowJBk+CVPSxZwVdLkYO2 =j3k4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081231232734.GE87057>