Date: 04 Mar 1999 17:17:13 +1100 From: Julian Assange <proff@iq.org> To: cgd@netbsd.org (Chris G. Demetriou) Cc: proff@iq.org Subject: Re: htonq Message-ID: <wx678hlqxi.fsf@yoshi.iq.org> In-Reply-To: cgd@netbsd.org's message of "03 Mar 1999 12:28:48 -0800" References: <199903030130.MAA17738@yoshi.iq.org> <87pv6r8igu.fsf@redmail.redback.com> <19990303124920.B7027@cs.uni-bonn.de> <87hfs25ncv.fsf@redmail.redback.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
cgd@netbsd.org (Chris G. Demetriou) writes: > do any other OSes do something w.r.t. hton and ntoh for 64-bit > integers? i'm pretty sure Digital UNIX does, but i don't recall what > it is... linux has hton64 / ntoh64 inside the kernel (though not in user land). if past behavior is any indicator this means that everyone else does something completely different :) hton64 is certainly more meaningful, though htonq is more in keeping with tradition, and printf's %q -- Julian Assange <proff@iq.org> http://iq.org/~proff Man is quite insane. He wouldn't know how to create a maggot and he creates Gods by the dozen. - Michel de Montaigne, _Essais_ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?wx678hlqxi.fsf>