Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:17:04 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, marino@freebsd.org Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@com.bat.ru>, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r396998 - head/net/samba36 Message-ID: <55FD3620.7060500@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <20150919074241.GA96797@FreeBSD.org> References: <201509151622.t8FGMXQY074723@repo.freebsd.org> <CALdFvJE17udNUQ=Y5JxwHphn2TWRMh-213_LfP-YOM3MN1Qx2A@mail.gmail.com> <0FAE77426236E9E47E15BFC1@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150919072048.GA86129@FreeBSD.org> <55FD0FA4.7050306@marino.st> <20150919074241.GA96797@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/19/2015 9:42 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > I'm fine with clear and umabiguous rules too. I just want bumping rules > to become more granular. Plain "package changed -> need a bump" means > that fixing a typo in pkg-descr would require it. Don't you think this > is a bit too extreme? I think there is already an exception for metadata changes such as pkg-descr and COMMENT and MAINTAINER, although I don't know if this exception is documented (it is done in practice). However shebang fixes are functional and definitely need a bump. They can be the difference between functioning and non-functioning packages. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55FD3620.7060500>