Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 16:17:36 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Per CPU timekeeping for SMP Message-ID: <v04210100b480582a423f@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <199912171941.LAA25185@c62443-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com> References: <19991205222423.A1391@sharmas.dhs.org> <199912171941.LAA25185@c62443-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:41 AM -0800 12/17/99, Arun Sharma wrote: >Arun Sharma wrote: > > > > > > Here's a reimplementation of my earlier per cpu time keeping patch > > on SMP. The attached patch is against a 11/20/99 -current that I > > cvsup'ed. > >Did anyone get a chance to review this ? Is everyone busy or sending >patches to -hackers is frowned upon ? Or is this something that >people aren't so excited about ? Probably need to send this to -current instead of -hackers. Also, pick a subject that says something about "patches for review". Also note that people are in the middle of pushing out the 3.4-release, so they might not have time to read all of the articles in hackers right now. I'm interested in the idea of per-CPU timekeeping, but at the moment I don't have a 4.x-current system setup, so I can't try this... I know I've seen others ask for detail at the per-CPU level, although I obviously don't know if your patch does exactly what they were asking for. --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04210100b480582a423f>