Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 02:00:02 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@nas.nasa.gov> Cc: Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95LJ1.1b3.990818014355.18030A-100000@sv01.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.990817091538.6014B-100000@marcy.nas.nasa.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Bill Studenmund wrote: > I've compared the two, and making the NetBSD number match the FreeBSD > number is one of my goals. :-) > > Any suggestions, or just plod&fix? It can be very cumbersome tracking down references being bumped by vref/VREF and other operations. Among the uncompleted operations are VOPs that pre-release the returned vpp to the caller. I think in VOP_MKNOD this was done as a convenience and you might have to add code to handle device vp aliases correctly. Just remember the rule, the allocating layer must be the layer that deallocates. Regards, Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95LJ1.1b3.990818014355.18030A-100000>