Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:02:15 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@vicor-nb.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG, wollman@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack. Message-ID: <20011116170214.A86121@iguana.aciri.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111161617160.6632-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <20011116160458.B85435@iguana.aciri.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111161617160.6632-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> so far there hasn't been a lot of suggestion as to how the goal can be > achieved however.. i actually suggested one i.e. have explicit pointers to metadata area(s) in the pkthdr. I think you forget the most fundamental feature which is performance. This is way more important than flexibility i think. > things it should be: > > 1/ flexible > 2/ queueable > 3/ transparent to 3rd party code that doesn't know about it. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011116170214.A86121>