Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:49:08 +0100
From:      Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        ticso@cicely12.cicely.de, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de
Subject:   Re: questions about current RM9200 state
Message-ID:  <20061208114906.GJ54209@cicely12.cicely.de>
In-Reply-To: <20061208104227.GH54209@cicely12.cicely.de>
References:  <20061208015032.GF54209@cicely12.cicely.de> <20061207.205008.-432839162.imp@bsdimp.com> <20061208104227.GH54209@cicely12.cicely.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 11:42:28AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:50:08PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message: <20061208015032.GF54209@cicely12.cicely.de>
> >             Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
> > : But I can't probe the bus from userland:
> > : [56]arm9# ./iic_probe /dev/iic0 
> > : - and nothing listed.
> > 
> > twi doesn't support START/STOP ioctls that you use.  Hmmm, that's in
> > p4 that I've removed them because I never got that working.  I also
> > think the version in -head isn't the latest, working one.  I think you
> > do the same thing with a 0 byte transfer.  Except we don't detect
> > NOACK quite right yet, I'm afraid.  I'd expect an error each time you
> > tried.
> 
> Ah - Ok, will switch to 0 Byte transfers and retest.

iic.c:
        case I2CWRITE:
                if (s->count <= 0) {
                        error = EINVAL;
                        break;
                }

Well - it wouldn't work without NOACK detection anyway.

-- 
B.Walter                http://www.bwct.de      http://www.fizon.de
bernd@bwct.de           info@bwct.de            support@fizon.de



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061208114906.GJ54209>