Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:08:56 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely9.cicely.de> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: realtime problem Message-ID: <20030410140855.GP96083@cicely9.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <3E94AD3C.B17D2751@mindspring.com> References: <20030409114957.GN83126@cicely9.cicely.de> <20030409160038.B658@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <3E94AD3C.B17D2751@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 04:31:08PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Harti Brandt wrote: > I still recommoned shoving HZ up by over a factor of 10, and the > quantum down by a factor of at least 5 less than the precision > required. That will (almost) guaranteed that you are always in a > loose ballpark around your 1mS deadline, which should be less than > 500uS. You may lose out once in a while, but it shouldn't bee too > often (I assume the thing's not going to be exposed to the Internet > ;^)). Well it depends. I have two options: - start from scratch - start with GPL software In the later case I have to expose... But I believe that I will publish it even in the first case. It's not going to be sold, so I don't have to make any garanties. It's just like burning CDRs - it usually works, but you always know that it may fail if you are out of luck. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030410140855.GP96083>