Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:31:07 -0700 From: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org> To: Conrad Rad <cse.cem@gmail.com> Cc: Conrad Meyer <conrad.meyer@isilon.com>, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bhyve: Support /domain/bootloader configuration for non-FreeBSD guests. Message-ID: <54498FBB.5060904@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAG6CVpUUgupe25093ujxgcMK4VrcQWBx9F2z1vFogCxTKKpP6w@mail.gmail.com> References: <1414094284-29055-1-git-send-email-cse.cem@gmail.com> <1414094284-29055-2-git-send-email-cse.cem@gmail.com> <54498764.6080404@freebsd.org> <CAG6CVpUUgupe25093ujxgcMK4VrcQWBx9F2z1vFogCxTKKpP6w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Conrad, > Unless I'm mistaken, the userspace loaders are still needed to boot > VMs for now. That's correct. > Will the Bhyve UEFI work be complete before MeetBSD? Most likely not. > And is it going into the FreeBSD 10 release branch, or only in 11? It will be MFCable. > Until that code actually materializes, I think it's important to fix > libvirt now. This change doesn't break a future Bhyve-that-supports > EUFI, and it can even be yanked out later if totally redundant. Good - I just wanted to make sure this change (or characterization of bhyve as PV) wasn't something that would hurt long-term. later, Peter.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54498FBB.5060904>