Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:43:41 +1000 From: John Marshall <john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au> To: "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@speakeasy.net> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.1 Heimdal KDC Message-ID: <20100909094341.GI16882@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au> In-Reply-To: <4C884E33.8090709@speakeasy.net> References: <4C884E33.8090709@speakeasy.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--eRtJSFbw+EEWtPj3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 08 Sep 2010, 20:02 -0700, Jason C. Wells wrote: > Could somebody please confirm that they are actually using 8.1-R with=20 > heimdal as a KDC successfully? A little confirmation would help me great= ly. I have 8.1-RELEASE running (base system) KDC's on three servers here. The master uses hprop to replicate to the slaves. The version of Heimdal on 8.1-RELEASE is Heimdal 1.1.0 Not all of the Heimdal man pages are installed on FreeBSD. I have found that hunting through man pages under /usr/src/crypto/heimdal helped me with compatibility issues between the Heimdal implementations on FreeBSD 7.n (Heimdal 0.6.3) and FreeBSD 8.n (Heimdal 1.1.0) - particularly the COMPATIBILITY section in /usr/src/crypto/heimdal/lib/gssapi/gssapi.3 --=20 John Marshall --eRtJSFbw+EEWtPj3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyIrE0ACgkQw/tAaKKahKIRbACfajVcxxjeAHh+ONtmw42O9a0/ WyYAoKxlRz1Tpa2Vmv+Mg3jus+28aVc9 =5oUg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eRtJSFbw+EEWtPj3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100909094341.GI16882>