Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:34:05 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: script(2) [was: [CFT/review] new sendfile(2)] Message-ID: <40210.1409607245@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <5404D1B8.9010006@mu.org> References: <20140529102054.GX50679@FreeBSD.org> <20140729232404.GF43962@funkthat.com> <20140831165022.GE7693@FreeBSD.org> <540382E2.3040004@freebsd.org> <2770.1409522711@critter.freebsd.dk> <5403B13C.60008@freebsd.org> <4204.1409549879@critter.freebsd.dk> <5404D1B8.9010006@mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <5404D1B8.9010006@mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >> In message <5403B13C.60008@freebsd.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >> >>> Lua at the syscall level makes sense. :) >> I doubt it. >> >> We're looking at high performance stuff and we don't want a silly >> parser and string processing involved. >> >Would it really matter? Lua is bytecode, [...] I though you wanted the interpreter in the kernel. If it's only the executor, then ... maybe... We'd need to do a serious audit of the lua bytecode first... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40210.1409607245>