Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:22:19 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Eric Dedrick <dedrick@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu> Cc: Jud <jud@myrealbox.com>, adam@vectors.cx, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux compatability broken Message-ID: <20020725192219.GC62267@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20020725141428.P304-100000@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu> References: <1027622522.65b8affcjud@myrealbox.com> <20020725141428.P304-100000@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jul 25), Eric Dedrick said: > > Just to clarify, I mean that using portupgrade will (hopefully, and > > in my experience, almost always) take care of your dependencies > > during the upgrade process, thus saving you from the IMO less > > preferable alternative of running more than one version of a port. > > > > Have you tried portupgrade with linux_base (after a backup of the > > old linux_base port skeleton and installation of the new one) to > > see whether Maple is happy? > > Yup. portupgrading eliminates ld-linux.so.1, required by maple. > Thanks for the suggestion, though. Hm. It shouldn't, since linux_base and linux_base-6 are different ports. Unless you had the RH6 version of linux_base, then installed linux_base-6, then upgraded linux_base to the RH7 version. The upgrade of linux_base would have effectively wiped out the linux_base-6 install. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020725192219.GC62267>