Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:54:29 +0000 From: "Alexandre Vieira" <nullpt@gmail.com> To: "Andrew Belashov" <bel@orel.ru>, carton@ivy.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netra T1 105 (sparc64) optimization Message-ID: <755cb9fc0611300454s4d28ad14rd402cba8388d49@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <456E8D8B.8010102@orel.ru> References: <755cb9fc0611290724q127f006va84f3457c48443b6@mail.gmail.com> <oq8xht7biy.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET> <456E8D8B.8010102@orel.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/30/06, Andrew Belashov <bel@orel.ru> wrote: > > Hello, All! > > Miles Nordin wrote: > >>>>>> "av" == Alexandre Vieira <nullpt@gmail.com> writes: > > > > av> kernel/tunables recommendations, > > > > I suggest device polling. This will increase the pps you can forward, > > and optimistically cause the machine to drop packets rather than go > > into livelock if the pps exceeds its ability. IMHO it should be used > > on any router. and IIRC it does work with the hme driver. > > I use device polling(4) patch for hme(4): > < > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=17147+0+archive/2006/freebsd-sparc64/20060423.freebsd-sparc64 > > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andrew Belashov. > > Hi, Thanks for the tips! I've added the patch for hme polling and I'm recompiling the kernel. I've striped the kernel a lot and I'm compiling with -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing. AFAIK there isn't any CPUTYPE available for this cpu. TIA -- Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?755cb9fc0611300454s4d28ad14rd402cba8388d49>