Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:09:39 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Subject: Re: NOT installing the .la files Message-ID: <200606131709.39605.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <m3k67k3h1i.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <200606112110.39148@aldan> <20060613170732.tql5t2lsn4w4ggog@netchild.homeip.net> <m3k67k3h1i.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
в╕второк 13 червень 2006 17:02, Matthias Andree написав: > Can we as port maintainers take this - and other relevant posts - as the > "go ahead" for not jumping hoops to remove .la files if some third-party > software we port installs them? Deleting them in post-install is easy enough. It may be dirty, but leaving them is even dirtier, IMO... When the libtool is finally fixed, removing these post-install targets will be easier, than fixing the plist files, because it will NOT require PORTREVISION bumps. -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606131709.39605.mi%2Bmx>