Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:50:13 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: With or without .packlist? Message-ID: <AFB0844B33D56DF9D89E8D30@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <20131010061045.GP16964@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20131010061045.GP16964@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+--On 10 octobre 2013 08:10:45 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: | Hi guys, |=20 | With the staging support, we can properly decide what we do pack or not | inside the packages, the question now is do we keep the .packlist (in | that case they need to be fixed because they are full of stage path :)) | or should we just drop those files and no package them at all. |=20 | It seems to me that most of the other operating systems are not = packaging. |=20 | I have no clue what what those .packlist files are useful for, so I do | have no opinion, would be nice to get a perl@ claim on this soon, as we | either need to fix them or nuke them. |=20 | btw: sunpoet has a PR I'm sitting one because of that: | http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/182806 Well, like I said in the PR history, I'm with Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric for = dropping them. In the mean time, you could do the exp-run, and see if something new breaks so that we can fix that :-) --=20 Mathieu Arnold
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AFB0844B33D56DF9D89E8D30>