Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:05:20 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Scott Bennett <bennett@cs.niu.edu>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   this time it's vim/distfiles
Message-ID:  <200907291305.n6TD5KST010432@mp.cs.niu.edu>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
     When portmaster tries to rebuild vim-lite, it tries to verify the
checksums of 239 (?) patches.  (I guess I should take that as a warning.)
Unfortunately, one of them apparently doesn't check out properly.  Here's
an excerpt of the portmaster output.

=> MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040.
=> No MD5 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^.
=> No SHA256 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^.
=> No suitable checksum found for vim/7.2.041^.
=> MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042.
     .
     .
     .
=> MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/editors/vim-lite.

===>>> make failed for editors/vim-lite
===>>> Aborting update

===>>> Update for vim-lite-7.2.209 failed
===>>> Aborting update

     I looked in distfiles and found that the line in question apparently
had an extraneous character that displays in less and vi as a percent sign.

DISTFILE:vim/7.2.040:SIZE=1836:SHA256=ad320d45c2541a767b351fdb8720c349c468acec8cf54dcfced0a6d1e58e5d8e:MD5=4c493255ae227498016f30a0002ec1cc
DISTFILE:vim/7.2.041%:SIZE=22405:SHA256=2f48e173df3d306edd982f8a3d5a15c65ba19694ca32bdbdaa51f8bcc48a3d06:MD5=107ba5dccb1df727601aead37abf8cd3
DISTFILE:vim/7.2.042:SIZE=4987:SHA256=d5fa884a7c5ee77b60fe512ceccaac640c0dfc00bd435211f4e4597ae3bee2cd:MD5=99baedef8a9c908774b7ed74deacf184

I tried deleting the extra character and rerunning portmaster, but that just
yields the same results.


                                  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**********************************************************************
* Internet:       bennett at cs.niu.edu                              *
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
* "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army."                                               *
*    -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790         *
**********************************************************************



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200907291305.n6TD5KST010432>