Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:31:42 +0300 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org, edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/132035: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COMMENT Message-ID: <86iqn0ldcx.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1235439881.1273.1.camel@widget.2hip.net> (Robert Noland's message of "Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:44:41 -0600") References: <200902240100.n1O10L0h095606@freefall.freebsd.org> <1235439881.1273.1.camel@widget.2hip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 01:00 +0000, edwin@FreeBSD.org wrote: >> Synopsis: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COMMENT >> >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-x11 >> Responsible-Changed-By: edwin >> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 24 01:00:20 UTC 2009 >> Responsible-Changed-Why: >> Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) > > Why do you want a slave port? That is just going to complicate things. Things are already complicated enough that distfile for libdrm-2.4.5 doesn't include libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_private.h As airlied explained on #dri-devel I guess it was itentional to force users to only use version from git. > I don't see any reason not to install the various libdrm interfaces > right now. As I understand nouveau interface is not stable. It may go away to a separate branch one day. If that happens I would not need to touch libdrm port, only convert libdrm-nouveau from slave port to a normal one with snapshot as distfile and switch xf86-video-nouveau to statically link with libdrm_nouveau.a. > > robert.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86iqn0ldcx.fsf>