Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 07:45:22 +0000 From: "Meyer, Wolfgang" <wolfgang.meyer@hob.de> To: 'Ryan Stone' <rysto32@gmail.com>, freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: How can I send packets to 255.255.255.255 from the command line? Message-ID: <EC88118611AE564AB0B10C6A4569004D015C057C24@HOBEX11.hob.de> In-Reply-To: <CAFMmRNwXKhNUg35eYS4bE4UZQxTrAhYDatnokDuMtTT33SUMwQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFMmRNwXKhNUg35eYS4bE4UZQxTrAhYDatnokDuMtTT33SUMwQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > net@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Stone > Sent: Donnerstag, 18. August 2016 21:30 > To: freebsd-net > Subject: How can I send packets to 255.255.255.255 from the command line? > > I want to test a change to broadcast packet handling and I want to confir= m > that 255.255.255.255 is still handled correctly. Are there any command-li= ne > tools in FreeBSD that can send to the broadcast address? ping > 255.255.255.255 does not work correctly, unfortunately. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello, this is a long-standing bug in the FreeBSD network implementation. The situ= ation has not changed since the examination done in comment 10 of this prob= lem report: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99558 In order to be able to send packets to the 255.255.255.255 IP address you n= eed to change the kernel sources. I have developed a patch (actually two of= them) that allows to work around the problem. The first approach looks for= the first network interface that is configured for broadcasting and sends = the broadcast to its network broadcast address. This should be in conforman= ce to the RFCs that leave it to the implementation whether to do the broadc= ast on an arbitraty network interface or on all of them. In my second attem= pt to tackle the problem I am looking in addition at the source address of = the IP packet and try to find a network interface that is in the same local= network as the source IP address. The code changes in the second approach = are probably a bit more hackish and might need some further testing. If you are interested I can provide you with the changes. They are based on= 10-stable or 11-stable as of not to long ago. As the to-be-patched sources= do not change a lot the patches should be applicable with no problems. Of = course I (or rather my company) would like to see the bug fixed in the Free= BSD sources and would be sympathetic to a review of the patches in the hope= to include them in the official sources. Regards, Wolfgang ________________________________ Follow HOB: - HOB: http://www.hob.de/redirect/hob.html - Xing: http://www.hob.de/redirect/xing.html - LinkedIn: http://www.hob.de/redirect/linkedin.html - HOBLink Mobile: http://www.hob.de/redirect/hoblinkmobile.html - Facebook: http://www.hob.de/redirect/facebook.html - Twitter: http://www.hob.de/redirect/twitter.html - YouTube: http://www.hob.de/redirect/youtube.html - E-Mail: http://www.hob.de/redirect/mail.html HOB GmbH & Co. KG Schwadermuehlstr. 3 D-90556 Cadolzburg Geschaeftsfuehrung: Klaus Brandstaetter, Zoran Adamovic AG Fuerth, HRA 5180 Steuer-Nr. 218/163/00107 USt-ID-Nr. DE 132747002 Komplementaerin HOB electronic Beteiligungs GmbH AG Fuerth, HRB 3416
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EC88118611AE564AB0B10C6A4569004D015C057C24>