Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 08:36:38 +1000 From: "Andrew Reilly" <andrew@lake.com.au> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: jack <jack@germanium.xtalwind.net>, John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adding desktop support Message-ID: <19990429083638.B34373@gurney.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <199904282017.NAA01044@dingo.cdrom.com>; from Mike Smith on Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 01:17:46PM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9904280927450.22235-100000@germanium.xtalwind.net> <199904282017.NAA01044@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 01:17:46PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > Since the overhead is minimal, and costs nothing at runtime, the > default would be to build _with_ them. Please focus your worry on > things that actually matter to the server application. 8) I have no argument about size costs. I have no argument about collecting per-program icons. My argument is that the executable is the wrong place to put them. -- Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990429083638.B34373>