Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:30:40 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, Navdeep Parhar <np@FreeBSD.org>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Cc: Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: MQ Patch. Message-ID: <52707D60.1070001@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5270462B.8050305@freebsd.org> References: <40948D79-E890-4360-A3F2-BEC34A389C7E@lakerest.net> <526FFED9.1070704@freebsd.org> <CA%2BhQ2%2BgTc87M0f5pvFeW_GCZDogrLkT_1S2bKHngNcDEBUeZYQ@mail.gmail.com> <52701D8B.8050907@freebsd.org> <527022AC.4030502@FreeBSD.org> <527027CE.5040806@freebsd.org> <5270309E.5090403@FreeBSD.org> <5270462B.8050305@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/30/13, 7:35 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > The holy grail so to say would be to run the entire stack with full > affinity up and down. That is certainly possible, provided the > application > is fully aware of it as well. In typical mixed load cases this is > unlikely > the case and the application(s) are floating around. with multithreaded apps it's *most likely* that writes will be coming from several differnent CPUs..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52707D60.1070001>