Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:43:20 +0300
From:      "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Colin Percival" <cperciva@freebsd.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject:   Re: Interesting speed benchmarks
Message-ID:  <cb5206420701252243l12e871dfhbc99886d884052b7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <45B9895B.9020709@freebsd.org>
References:  <20070125.192448.-432840241.imp@bsdimp.com> <45B9895B.9020709@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/26/07, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> wrote:
> M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > On a lark, I just got a combo USB/Firewire external disk drive.  I ran
> > some crude benchmarks, and I was surprised by what I found.  This is
> > on a fairly stock -current kernel.
> >
> > Firewire does around 40MB/s, while USB 2.0 maxes out at about 12MB/s.
>
> Either amd64 is slower than i386, there has been a performance regression
> between 6.2-RELEASE and whatever version of FreeBSD you're running, or you
> have a rather slow external drive.  I get 25MB/s from my Vantec Nexstar3
> USB 2.0 enclosure:
>
> http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2006-01-28-vantex-nexstar3.html

I've always (since 5.x I think) got 25Mb/s on i386
and half that on amd64, no matter what equipment I
try.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420701252243l12e871dfhbc99886d884052b7>