Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:23:50 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERFMON isn't operational on amd64 Message-ID: <20100727132350.GN22295@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim3m4VX3sy6diTNna2Yb7i%2B4RQZ0kT6U7e_wqTU@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTim3m4VX3sy6diTNna2Yb7i%2B4RQZ0kT6U7e_wqTU@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--QQNwO3VdVfodZayb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:43:00PM +0400, pluknet wrote: > Hi. >=20 > What is a status of "options PERFMON" on amd64? > AFAIK PERFMON opt. was inherited from i386 port and never worked. > Does it make sense to wipe out perfmon part on amd64? >=20 > buildkernel with PERFMON on results in error: > /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c:124:29: error: machine/perfmon.h: > No such file or directory > mkdep: compile failed > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Looking at cvs I see amd64/include/perfmon.h was never here. I think perfmon should be removed from i386 too. Would you prepare the patch ? --QQNwO3VdVfodZayb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkxO3eYACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gypwCgnjXk7keVj6x3tCHhEiLbRRfE kcEAoOWS88hckUpp+PJme6LdYLsIupyb =EJUc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QQNwO3VdVfodZayb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100727132350.GN22295>