Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:49:34 +0100 From: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> To: Dave Overton <dave@syix.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portaudit and portsnap acting silly. Message-ID: <20071227234934.GA86902@megatron.madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <006f01c848bd$cbcda550$26714dd1@syix.com> References: <006f01c848bd$cbcda550$26714dd1@syix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:22:18AM -0800, Dave Overton wrote: > Portaudit does this: > # portaudit -Fa > auditfile.tbz 100% of 46 kB 6001 kBps > portaudit: Database too old. > Old database restored. > portaudit: Download failed. > > > Portsnap does this: > # portsnap fetch > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap3.FreeBSD.org... done. > Latest snapshot on server is older than what we already have! > Cowardly refusing to downgrade from Thu Dec 27 08:10:58 PST 2007 > to Mon Dec 3 17:04:28 PST 2007. > > > In case anyone knows anyone who can beat them back into submission. Are you using a proxy server. I encountered similar problems with a proxy. In fact I usually set up squid not to cache portsnap[0-9].freebsd.org. Never seen such a problem with portaudit though... Hope this helps. -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071227234934.GA86902>