Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 21:28:28 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Who built XFree86 with Kerberos? Message-ID: <199810281928.VAA13785@gratis.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of " Wed, 28 Oct 1998 10:53:11 PST." <199810281853.KAA29876@hub.freebsd.org> References: <199810281853.KAA29876@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
wrote: > In reply to Doug White who wrote: > > I have a mailing list of confused users who want to meet you. > > > > Please rebuild X without Kerberos; Kerberos is certainly *NOT* the common > > case. > > Same holds for lots of the packages :( The problem is obly on one machine; the port-builder. That one clearly has KerberosIV (eBones) enabled, and the X is Kerberos-enabled. As a consequence, all X-ports are Kerberos-enabled. Fix 1 thing, fix'em all. What machine is used to build all the ports? M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810281928.VAA13785>