Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:36:45 +0100
From:      Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To:        Bill Paul <wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: group(5) limits
Message-ID:  <199612182336.AAA00506@campa.panke.de>
In-Reply-To: <199612170557.AAA01510@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu>
References:  <199612170124.CAA02231@campa.panke.de> <199612170557.AAA01510@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Paul writes:
>While removing the static membership limit of 200 is probably okay, NIS v2
>is permanently saddled with a record limit of 1024 bytes. The yp_mkdb(8)
>utility enforces this. The limit is part of the yp.x protocol, consequently
>to change it would break compatibility with all other NIS implementations.
>This means these changes would be fine for local /etc/group files, but
>you'd still be stuck with a 1024 byte line limit if you choose to use
NIS.

I can reduce the limit from 256K to 1k. But didn't we already break
NIS with increasing user name length from 8 characters to 16
characters?

Wolfram



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612182336.AAA00506>