Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:32:07 +0100
From:      Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
To:        Yuval Levy <freebsd-current@sfina.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: FreeBSD 6.0 and onwards
Message-ID:  <p06002087bdb54f88705b@[10.0.1.3]>
In-Reply-To:  <JDEKJNLCGHFCNEBPGLHBCEFBFDAA.freebsd-current@sfina.com>
References:   <JDEKJNLCGHFCNEBPGLHBCEFBFDAA.freebsd-current@sfina.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:48 AM -0500 2004-11-08, Yuval Levy wrote:

>                                          I'd go one step further: Rather than
>  declaring the CURRENT branch STABLE and open a new CURRENT branch, I would
>  suggest to let both branches grow indefinitely with STABLE playing catch-up
>  on CURRENT.

	That's not possible.  You can't continually accrete more and more 
patches on top of one another.  Sooner or later, you have to make 
discontinuous changes.  FreeBSD works to make these as smooth and as 
infrequent as reasonably possible, but they still have to 
occasionally be made.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

     -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
     Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755

   SAGE member since 1995.  See <http://www.sage.org/>; for more info.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06002087bdb54f88705b>