Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:51:14 -0800 (PST) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_upgrade (was Re: pkg_add does not backtrack, does it?) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0702091451140.5619@hymn09.u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20070209200309.GH834@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2007-Feb-09 09:43:01 -0800, youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: >> On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Mike Meyer wrote: >>> Personally, I think that's cool, but it does means it won't go into >>> the base system. Portupgrade would probably be in the base system if >>> it were written in a language in the base system. >> >> Would perl be close enough to count, or would it have to be C/C++? > > Perl was removed in 5.x. Your options are shell, awk and C/C++. > > -- > Peter Jeremy C++ would be it then. -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.43.0702091451140.5619>