Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:14:00 -0700 From: stephen@dino.dnsalias.com (Stephen J. Bevan) To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD-net@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>, Gianmarco Giovannelli <gmarco@masternet.it> Subject: Re: Problems with gif tunnels Message-ID: <17066.36664.822624.172889@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20050611064800.GR87456@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20050608195837.Q65103@Neo-Vortex.net> <20050608104053.GK41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050608233136.GX64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050608234559.GS41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050609001004.GB64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050609080446.05c897d0@83.149.160.120> <20050609074439.GT41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <17066.30185.318421.273508@localhost.localdomain> <20050611052801.GQ87456@wantadilla.lemis.com> <17066.32221.665435.20574@localhost.localdomain> <20050611064800.GR87456@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes: > Ah, my bad. But nos-tun also does IP-IP, so he was using the correct > tool. So that doesn't seem to be the problem here. By default non-tun uses protocol 94 which is not compatible with gif(4) and Linux IPIP, both of which protocol 4. There is an option (-p) to tell nos-tun to use protocol 4 but either Gianmarco didn't use it or there was some other kind of problem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17066.36664.822624.172889>