Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 10:16:34 +1030 (CST) From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: proff@suburbia.net Cc: shanee@rabbit.augusta.de, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: w problem Message-ID: <199701072346.KAA11935@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <19970107220300.5821.qmail@suburbia.net> from "proff@suburbia.net" at "Jan 8, 97 09:03:00 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
proff@suburbia.net stands accused of saying: > > Was this utmp change entirely necessary? From now on, xf86 has to produce two > versions of its binary distribution, pre and post utmp mangle. No, they produce a single version linked against libutil. > It seems to me that a little more discussion could have gone into this. More than the 18 months or so that have already ensued? You've got to be kidding. -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701072346.KAA11935>