Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:58:35 -0300
From:      William Grzybowski <wg@freebsd.org>
To:        koobs@freebsd.org
Cc:        "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r367138 - head/www/py-flexget
Message-ID:  <CAHtVNLNH62ybHpzWJOonsdiy1TOwCYLN7YCPcqvuMCsj5tNsig@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5406895E.2040109@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201409022328.s82NSIIh033490@svn.freebsd.org> <5406895E.2040109@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Kubilay Kocak <koobs@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 3/09/2014 9:28 AM, William Grzybowski wrote:
>> Author: wg
>> Date: Tue Sep  2 23:28:17 2014
>> New Revision: 367138
>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/367138
>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r367138/
>>
>> Log:
>>   www/py-flexget: mark as broken for now
>>
>>   - Does not run with python dateutil 2.2
>>
>> Modified:
>>   head/www/py-flexget/Makefile
>>
>> Modified: head/www/py-flexget/Makefile
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- head/www/py-flexget/Makefile      Tue Sep  2 23:27:56 2014        (r367137)
>> +++ head/www/py-flexget/Makefile      Tue Sep  2 23:28:17 2014        (r367138)
>> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ TEST_DEPENDS:=      ${RUN_DEPENDS} \
>>               ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}nose>0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-nose \
>>               ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}mock>0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-mock
>>
>> +BROKEN=      Does not work with devel/py-dateutil 2.2
>> +
>>  USES=                python:2
>>  USE_PYTHON=  autoplist distutils
>>
>>
>
> Was this error about requirements (dateutil != 2.2) or a runtime/tests
> error?
>
> If it was the latter, patch here should fix it:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/dateutil/+bug/1247643
>
> Can you test and let me know if flexget works again, I'll backport it to
> dateutil

Yes and it does, flexget people made that patch but no response from
upstream, which worries me. There is nothing to prove it won't break
other packages.



-- 
William Grzybowski / wg
FreeBSD Ports Committer



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHtVNLNH62ybHpzWJOonsdiy1TOwCYLN7YCPcqvuMCsj5tNsig>