Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:34:59 +0200 From: Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available Message-ID: <b2e18bbe12ba52752d97a2189b436a47@mailbox.ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <CAE2yjrqjNj1EJNZAa2FTfNyimpKpEXMdEyn9kdFH8PgqrTT8YQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <523D79CD.2090302@FreeBSD.org> <53F4CE0E.8040106@FreeBSD.org> <CAE2yjrqjNj1EJNZAa2FTfNyimpKpEXMdEyn9kdFH8PgqrTT8YQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bryan Drewery wrote: > Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 > i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. > > Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly > respect LDFLAGS. > > To enable, just add WITH_SSP=yes to your make.conf and rebuild all > ports. > > The default SSP_CLFAGS is -fstack-protector, but -fstack-protector-all > may optionally be set instead. That's probably SSP_CFLAGS, not SSP_CLFAGS. Does clang (in 10-STABLE or CURRENT) support also the option -fstack-protector-strong ? Is 'world' by default compiled with -fstack-protector (and if not, why not). Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b2e18bbe12ba52752d97a2189b436a47>