Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:34:05 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Subject: Re: LATEST_LINK unique or not? Message-ID: <1093307645.83778.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <412A3ED0.12730.80F02992@localhost> References: <412A1B18.4785.80649D9F@localhost> <412A3ED0.12730.80F02992@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-aqQkh3bstIOK2l40kfsu Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 19:00, Dan Langille wrote: > On 24 Aug 2004 at 0:37, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: >=20 > > Dan Langille wrote: > >=20 > > > Is LATEST_LINK supposed to be unique? It's not. There's about 201 > > > ports which have duplicate values. > >=20 > > It is, expect when NO_LATEST_LINK is set (in which case no latest link=20 > > exists). Did you filtr out these cases? Everything else is bug, Kris di= d=20 > > some survey AFAIK. >=20 > I obtained my list from the output of "make -V LATEST_LINK" and paid=20 > no attention to NO_LATEST_LINK. >=20 > Are you saying LATEST_LINK must be ignored if NO_LATEST_LINK is set? =20 Yes. > Why is this not done programatically? i.e. output an empty string. No reason that I can see. It could be made to output en empty value if NO_LATEST_LINK is set. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-aqQkh3bstIOK2l40kfsu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBKoz9b2iPiv4Uz4cRAqBmAJ9sSAO2uPEuv8vsyFULXEa5ZdR/dwCfa455 AY7YYUUZuLAPz7Ud8IPpdqM= =v8Qv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-aqQkh3bstIOK2l40kfsu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1093307645.83778.2.camel>