Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 22:52:28 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Liam Slusser <liam@tiora.net>, Kenny Drobnack <kdrobnac@mission.mvnc.edu>, "Harry M. Leitzell" <Harry_M_Leitzell@cmu.edu>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel Message-ID: <5190.937601548@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:48:19 MDT." <199909172048.OAA05040@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199909172048.OAA05040@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: >In message <5082.937599515@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >: There is a new kid in town if it comes to fortifying your FreeBSD >: box: jail(2|8) > >Is jail(2) in 3.3R? Or just -current? I ask because I had to have >different suser tests depending on 3.x and 4.0 in the chflags security >patches. Only current. I have no MFC plans. Although it could be trivially done I don't think there currently is a market demand for doing so, and I don't have the time anyway... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5190.937601548>