Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:00:40 +1300
From:      Andrew Thompson <thompsa@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Running rtadvd or DHCPv6 server via if_bridge interface
Message-ID:  <20100319000040.GC45454@citylink.fud.org.nz>
In-Reply-To: <EFAF0399-1809-4902-8C7E-33812D296D92@lassitu.de>
References:  <20091211052349.0000517a@unknown> <20091211065141.GL88840@marvin.timesinks.net> <EFAF0399-1809-4902-8C7E-33812D296D92@lassitu.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:27:43PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 11.12.2009 um 07:51 schrieb Chris Cowart:
> 
> > Bruce Cran wrote:
> >> I have a router configured using if_bridge with a 4-port NIC that's
> >> serving addresses over DHCP. I'd like to add in either rtadvd or
> >> DHCPv6, but neither work because the bridge interface doesn't have an
> >> IPv6 link-local address. Is there a way around this, or is it not
> >> possible to serve IPv6 addresses over if_bridge interfaces?
> > 
> > It's totally doable; you just have to assigned a link-local address to
> > the bridge. There are some reasons why one isn't defined by default,
> > which somebody more knowledgeable about the challenges in the
> > implementation can highlight.
> > 
> > Here's my configuration from rc.conf:
> > 
> > ipv6_ifconfig_bridge0="2001:470:8337:10::1/64"
> > ipv6_ifconfig_bridge0_alias0="fe80::2%bridge0 prefixlen 64"
> > 
> > Once you're doing that, rtadvd will start doing the right thing.
> 
> I've just stumbled over this the first time.
> 
> I thought that best practice nowadays was to use the bridge interface for host communications, and leaving the physical interfaces unconfigured, so I'm a bit confused why if_bridge would not allow the auto-assignment of a link-local address.
> 
> If you have two or more bridged interfaces now, and you enable automatic assignment of link-local addresses, you already have multiple link-locals this way; having the bridge have one as well wouldn't make things worse (I think).
> 

http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=149829

"IPv6 auto-configuration is disabled. An IPv6 link-local address has a
link-local scope within one link, the spec is unclear for the bridge
case and it may cause scope violation."

That is the reason. I dont know if its still true but you would need to
find someone more familair with IPv6 to comment on it.


cheers,
Andrew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100319000040.GC45454>