Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:23:24 +0100 From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Cc: Ben Jencks <bjencks@hmc.edu> Subject: Re: X.Org ports upgrade to 6.9 release Message-ID: <200512300423.25326.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <86psnjavwy.fsf@wagner.bjencks.net> References: <86psnjavwy.fsf@wagner.bjencks.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 27 of December 2005 07:36, Ben Jencks wrote: > Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > As you might already know, new X Window System has been released by X.Org > > a couple of days ago. > > Anyhow, the first cut of patch for ports tree to upgrade X.Org ports to > > 6.9.0 is here: > > http://www.ijs.si/~lesi/xorg/xorg-69/xorg-up-690-1.patch > > It also does away with separate mtree file for xorg-* and dependent ports > > so it touches a few of other ports as well. > > According to the 6.9 release notes, the bundled Mesa was upgraded to > 6.4.1. It looks we don't use the bundled Mesa, but instead use the > graphics/dri port, which is Mesa 6.2.1. Either graphics/dri should be > upgraded to 6.4.1, or the bundled Mesa should be used. Working on upgrade. > It looks like newer versions of Mesa require libdrm to be installed. > xorg-server installs libdrm.so, but not the pkg-config file Mesa > requires. I made a port for libdrm that uses the distribution from > http://dri.freedesktop.org/libdrm/ but it would probably be better to > use the one bundled with xorg, in extras/drm/libdrm. Should this be a > separate port, or part of xorg-server or -libraries? > -Ben Jencks Separate port I think, since we're going to go with modular X.Org 7.0 builds eventually anyway. Thanks for noticing. Dejan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200512300423.25326.dejan.lesjak>