Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 18:09:46 -0600 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r397901 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg Message-ID: <4D58475A-C7B5-4D08-8B44-039B357A8975@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <201509252314.t8PNEI5t002953@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201509252314.t8PNEI5t002953@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 25 Sep, 2015, at 17:14, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> = wrote: >=20 > Author: bapt > Date: Fri Sep 25 23:14:18 2015 > New Revision: 397901 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/397901 >=20 > - Document @{pre,post}[un]exec in plist added in pkg 1.5 Interesting! I had no idea. Can something about this---anything---be = added to CHANGES, or the PHB? I know that updating the PHB is awkward and time-consuming, but a single = sentence in CHANGES saying "There are new plist keywords: @pre[un]exec = will do ____ and @post[un]exec will do it after _____" would go a long = way. Please remember that we (ports committers and maintainers) want to keep = up with current best practices, but it's hard to do so when we don't get = told about infrastructure changes. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D58475A-C7B5-4D08-8B44-039B357A8975>