Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:48:07 +0000
From:      Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" <jnagyjr1978@gmail.com>
Cc:        "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, ruby@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Ports with version numbers going backwards: sysutils/fusefs-httpfs
Message-ID:  <CADLo838TxPnqhU2cFSX1TGJVdMbp55h=VNSJBAr%2BtdNsR4XmDw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5123CAE8.90107@gmail.com>
References:  <5123ca0a.1aac68.41d9f052@portsindexbuild.ysv.FreeBSD.org> <5123CAE8.90107@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 February 2013 18:56, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr <jnagyjr1978@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/19/13 12:52, erwin@FreeBSD.org wrote:
>>
>> ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous
>> one **
>>
>>   For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance
>> that
>>   version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over
>> time.
>>   Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Conventions' for
>>   more information. Tools that won't work include pkg_version, portupgrade
>>   and portaudit. A common error is an accidental deletion of PORTEPOCH.
>>
>>   Please fix any errors as soon as possible.
>>
>>   The ports tree was updated at Tue Feb 19 2013 18:36:41 UTC.
>>
>> - *sysutils/fusefs-httpfs* <ports@FreeBSD.org>: fusefs-httpfs-2.0.1.5 <
>> fusefs-httpfs-2.06.08.26
>
> I have a similar issue with ruby:
>
> ruby-1.9.3.327,1                   >   succeeds port (port has 1.9,1)
>
> CC'd to ruby@

I'm guessing you're using portversion?  Is the pkgdb up to date?

[crees@pegasus]~% make -f /usr/ports/lang/ruby19/Makefile -VPORTVERSION
1.9.3.385

Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838TxPnqhU2cFSX1TGJVdMbp55h=VNSJBAr%2BtdNsR4XmDw>