Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:55:41 +0200 (CEST) From: "Michael Nottebrock" <lofi@freebsd.org> To: "Andy Fawcett" <andy@athame.co.uk> Cc: kde@freebsd.org, Vijay Patel <patelvijayp.news@gmail.com>, ports@freebsd.org, gnome@freebsd.org, Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] gettext error Message-ID: <1348.213.196.231.115.1175968541.squirrel@lofi.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200704071151.50787.andy@athame.co.uk> References: <003901c778d8$e53b8260$0100a8c0@team1> <1175928275.59311.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <D14A42B7-36D5-42BA-B6C4-2B3EEFC32707@freebsd.org> <200704071151.50787.andy@athame.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andy Fawcett wrote: > On Saturday 07 April 2007 11:32:19 Ade Lovett wrote: >> On Apr 06, 2007, at 23:44 , Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> > Well, I've already expressed my opinion that threading be disabled. >> > Since FreeBSD doesn't allow mixing threaded libraries with non- >> > threaded >> > executables (without linking the executable with PTHREAD_LIBS) :-(, >> > threading is just dangerous. I don't think we want to force all ports >> > that link to libintl to become thread-aware. >> >> Yup. I think this is the way to go myself. I'd just like consensus >> from the KDE folks before I simply bump PORTREVISION and add -- >> disable-threads to CONFIGURE_ARGS. > > Sounds fine to me too. We've not had it threaded before, so not missed it > either. > > Unless lofi has some strong objection to this, consider this an ok from > kde@ Ok from me as well. FWIW, we'd probably be fine either way, since everything that links to qt already needs to link to a threads library. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1348.213.196.231.115.1175968541.squirrel>