Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:47:20 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flash10 Message-ID: <03736103@bb.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20090405212925.GA24637@triton.kn-bremen.de> (Juergen Lock's message of "Sun\, 5 Apr 2009 23\:29\:25 %2B0200") References: <23488525@bb.ipt.ru> <1238666988.1670.7.camel@localhost> <80593204@bb.ipt.ru> <747dc8f30904020606p20431cf5q85172584459bb4eb@mail.gmail.com> <20090402161055.13604d4pu3iibkqo@webmail.leidinger.net> <200904041914.n34JEbxq087408@triton.kn-bremen.de> <91284950@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <25204710@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <20090405212925.GA24637@triton.kn-bremen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 23:29:25 +0200 Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 01:46:17AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:42:17 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:14:37 +0200 (CEST) Juergen Lock wrote:
> >
> > > > Btw... It _seems_ all thats missing now to make a linux-f8-flashplugin10
> > > > port are linux-f8-libidn and linux-f8-{nss,nspr}, so if anyone wants to
> > > > have a go at that before the freeze... :) (flash10 won't work with fc4.)
> >
> > > If you want to test flash10 here are those three ports (tested
> > > only at tinderbox, no dependencies). Shar archieve attached.
> >
> > Hm, well: ftp://ftp.ipt.ru/pub/linux/ports.shar
> OK, the following played a vid on youtube and the markmail flash widget
> also still worked. It is by far not a finished port, see the comments in
> the Makefile... particularly I still had to manually extract a libssh2
> rpm which the f8 libcurl depends on, and it also needs a proper MASTER_SITE
> for the new libflashsupport which I installed manually because of that,
> see below. Oh and you'll need to manually install the three new ports
> as well since bsd.linux-apps.mk doesn't yet know about them.
OK, all needed ports and infrastructure changes were committed.
> (Btw, should this do a specific check for OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS
> being f8 since only that will work?)
For this particular port it is not needed since new ports exist
only for f8. But generally it's a good idea.
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?03736103>