Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:20:56 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 10.0-RC1: bad mbuf leak? Message-ID: <11BB3983-28F7-40EF-87DA-FD95BD297EA7@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140104195505.GV71033@glebius.int.ru> References: <1387204500.12061.60192349.19EAE1B4@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAJ-VmonGE2=vmFOnCtLVLyNp0=F%2BNUd6OdU6=rROH_PWkyXSDA@mail.gmail.com> <EE2A759D-B9BB-4176-BAC6-D6D3C45E2CD1@FreeBSD.org> <3A115E20-3ADB-49BA-885D-16189B97842B@FreeBSD.org> <20131225133356.GL71033@FreeBSD.org> <BAD36C0E-BC8D-4AB1-9E11-FE26E537DBA7@lurchi.franken.de> <20140104195505.GV71033@glebius.int.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_74408AB9-BABD-4904-A0E4-EFD0533CC02C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 4, 2014, at 13:55, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Thanks, Michael! >=20 > On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 07:47:27PM +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote: > M> > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:54:33AM -0600, Mark Felder wrote: > M> > M> > finally found some free time today to try to look into this. = I was digging into the SVN changelogs of sys/dev/e1000 and couldn't see = any obvious changes that I should revert. Instead I went a different = route and jumped to HEAD/CURRENT. I'm not seeing the mbufs leaking yet. = I'll need another 24 hours to confirm. Hopefully this is a worthwhile = clue. I'm a bit surprised nobody else has reported this type of = behavior... maybe 10 isn't getting the amount of testing we expect? = ...or maybe it's just my lonely, haunted hardware :( > M> > M>=20 > M> > M> Ok, I feel safe confirming that 10.0-RCs are not stable on my = hardware. The mbuf problem went away completely when I jumped to = head/current. > M> > M>=20 > M> > M> Can someone please suggest what patch I can attempt to back = out to fix this? I'd like to try to assist in fixing this before = 10.0-RELEASE happens or we're going to have some very angry users. > M> >=20 > M> > Is it possible for you to bisect head from the stable/10 = branchpoint up > M> > to the current date and narrow down the revisions that introduced = (and later > M> > fixed?) the leak? > M> I did a bisect and > M> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/258690 > M> resolved the issue on my system: >=20 > I have just merged this change to head as r260280. >=20 > Mark, can you pleast confirm that now stable/10 no longer leaks mbufs > at your setup? >=20 > --=20 > Totus tuus, Glebius. I'll build 10-STABLE right away. --Apple-Mail=_74408AB9-BABD-4904-A0E4-EFD0533CC02C Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSyG0oAAoJEJg7ZFAfE+JSOmgIAJQXAat4oXKiNREH7QunVO5Q PT3inTgLc4vqzOVnMY+XGrIBj4aQ9BOZ+cp1G50X6bmoKeWbXJil7EdWrQHFcb/f u0SxmzLVpkKnne+hxzT87ZpvVkOa8xSyVX8SZyzaM3adS07PIKL1C3WecC+Kmncd cqldcGnnbUs6iaI8Y95bcpqpJrGYtBsPhJp7R7sag1yHNtkKoFHPBrmNrdk4cGbt i4Q6+pwoPqP8+bm+uaOkxDkvEJbN51tTCCmOhftC+ZfTwlvAA3OW/dxk/X9I4wWB sqPX7XwLv/ZqTh4MCpDV8q/2v2rL+Fk8KzQP4i/WbnHGVJPsEh3Bsd9bSzwnMcU= =L3vU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_74408AB9-BABD-4904-A0E4-EFD0533CC02C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11BB3983-28F7-40EF-87DA-FD95BD297EA7>