Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:30:46 +0300
From:      Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Dmitry Chagin <dchagin@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r292777 - in head: lib/libc/sys sys/kern
Message-ID:  <20151227193046.GE4535@zxy.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <1451243810.1369.10.camel@freebsd.org>
References:  <201512271537.tBRFb7nN095297@repo.freebsd.org> <1451236237.1369.9.camel@freebsd.org> <20151227184101.GG70867@zxy.spb.ru> <1451243810.1369.10.camel@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 12:16:50PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:

> On Sun, 2015-12-27 at 21:41 +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:10:37AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, 2015-12-27 at 15:37 +0000, Dmitry Chagin wrote:
> > > > Author: dchagin
> > > > Date: Sun Dec 27 15:37:07 2015
> > > > New Revision: 292777
> > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/292777
> > > > 
> > > > Log:
> > > >   Verify that tv_sec value specified in settimeofday() and
> > > > clock_settime()
> > > >   (CLOCK_REALTIME case) system calls is non negative.
> > > >   This commit hides a kernel panic in atrtc_settime() as the
> > > > clock_ts_to_ct()
> > > >   does not properly convert negative tv_sec.
> > > >   
> > > >   ps. in my opinion clock_ts_to_ct() should be rewritten to
> > > > properly
> > > > handle
> > > >   negative tv_sec values.
> > > >   
> > > >   Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4714
> > > >   Reviewed by:		kib
> > > >   
> > > >   MFC after:	1 week
> > > 
> > > IMO, this change is completely unacceptable.  If there is a bug in
> > > atrtc code, then by all means fix it, but preventing anyone from
> > > setting valid time values on the system because one driver's code
> > > can't
> > > handle it is just wrong.
> > 
> > You talk about kernel panic when internal data structures not
> > destructed is normal behavior? Realy?
> > 
> 
> I have no idea what you mean by that -- I didn't say anything at all
> about panic.

As I understund commit log -- this is prevent kernel panic at some
call (with illegal arguments). This accpetable irrelevant to bugs in
calling code.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151227193046.GE4535>