Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:59:14 +0100 From: "Antoine Brodin" <antoine@freebsd.org> To: "Norikatsu Shigemura" <nork@freebsd.org> Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Subject: Re: Change select(2) to kevent(2) on script(1)... Message-ID: <f19c444a0812220759i44707666oc91e25cda225d75b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20081223002901.9b71e60d.nork@FreeBSD.org> References: <20081221012752.cdc5cbfc.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20081221211949.GS1176@hoeg.nl> <20081222091203.GA28920@freebsd.org> <494F740E.3040502@FreeBSD.org> <20081223002901.9b71e60d.nork@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org> wrote: > I think that performance improvement is significant(I don't > think performance improved by my patch). But my patch is the > first implementation of kqueue/kevent support for TTY. > In fact, I could find a bug. I hope to commit my patch. But > by performance reason, my patch is not accepted, I have no > problem. Hi, Could you make it a compile time option, similar to the USE_KQUEUE option in make(1) ? I had to write something similar to script(1) for work recently, that ran on linux, and the freebsd sources were quite useful. Cheers, Antoine
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f19c444a0812220759i44707666oc91e25cda225d75b>