Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:04:39 -0500 From: Adam Vandemore <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: anybody know about a 3.01 package *With* browser? Message-ID: <49DA6057.4090401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090406195323.GA30516@thought.org> References: <20090405224918.GA41941@thought.org> <4ad871310904051841u1f127e83o234f730551c8eef0@mail.gmail.com> <20090406021022.GB41137@thought.org> <ade45ae90904052051t41c62becmcc954f66b9149bf@mail.gmail.com> <18905.32447.853120.350314@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20090406195323.GA30516@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gary Kline wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:02:07AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > >> Tim Judd writes: >> >> >>> I don't understand the "months/years" or "weeks/days" symptom of OOo. >>> >>> On my dual-core system at work, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ >>> 2.40GHz >>> >>> Took about 4 hours. It only seemed to utilize only 1 CPU... my >>> top always said <=50% CPU usage >>> >> For comparison: on a P4/2.26ghz/2 gbyte RAM, lightly loaded >> with fairly fast SCSI disks, it takes 30+ hours. >> >> >> Robert Huff >> > > Sorry if this is getting old.... . > > I'm running two desktops, one 2.8GHz, this one 2.4. Both with > "only" 1G ram. I useemy hardware pretty intensively, not lightly > loaded, and building a full-blown OO takes at least three days. > ---This is when I've got plenty of space. With fewer than 5G > disk, forget it. That's why I want my next computer to be not > only powerful but with diskspace to burn. > > > > just got done compiling ooo3 devel on 1.4 gz pentium-m. I think it took less than a day, 512 ram, nothing else running. -- Adam Vandemore Systems Administrator IMED Mobility (605) 498-1610
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49DA6057.4090401>